100 S. Murphy Ave. Suite 200, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 info@euhc4ca.org +1 408.462.0452

EUHC4CA Poll: 61% of Californians support tax increases for Single Payer

In a recent poll of over two thousand Californians, 61% said “Yes” when asked if they were willing to pay taxes for single payer universal healthcare.

SUNNYVALE, Calif. – Jan. 31, 2019 — In what can only be described as stunning, Californians increased their support of taxes for a single payer universal healthcare system from 59% in November 2018 to 61% in January 2019.

“There’s a healthcare rebellion brewing. Californians are fed up with private insurance companies and the foot-dragging by the Legislature, and are demanding Single Payer,” said Dale Fountain, Chairperson/CEO of Enact Universal Healthcare for California.

Independent polling by the Public Policy Institute of California showed 60% in December.

“61%? Frankly, I’m shocked it’s that low. This just shows Single Payer has moved from the left into the center,” says Vice Chairperson Michael Saucedo.

Recently, EUHC4CA released its Soft Single Payer proposal, which costs the state less than half a percent of other single payer proposals, no tax increases, and provides tuition and retirement assistance to doctors and nurses.

EUHC4CA is the largest single payer organization in California with over 117,000 supporters within the state.

Enact Universal Healthcare for California partnered with Google Surveys to ask one question: “Instead of paying health insurance companies (premiums, copays, and deductibles), would you pay those to California in taxes for single payer healthcare?
The January poll randomly queried Californians with a sample size of 2017 at a 95% confidence and +/- 2% error.


Soft Single Payer Proposal — Jan. 2019

Yesterday, we submitted this proposal for “Soft” Single Payer to the leaders of the Assembly. The proposal addresses many of the intractable concerns with “Hard” Single Payer, such as a state constitutional amendment needed to exempt healthcare from revenue restrictions, federal waivers, and challenges with ERISA (self-funded) employer health plans. There is also the psychology behind large increases to the state’s budget, and people’s perception of taxes and how insurance works. After years of research and reaching out to legal experts, we believe this is the most feasible and legally viable proposal that will get us as close as possible to single payer universal healthcare in California.

Our proposal will instead have the state charter and own a nonprofit insurance corporation that would insure people based on their incomes in the gap between Medicaid and Medicare. By being a standalone insurance company, it can also enter into contracts for Medicaid managed plans, Medicare Advantage plans, list on the Covered California exchange, and be offered through employers. Through a “Grand Bargain” between the state and providers, we can eliminate copays, coinsurance, out-of-pocket, and deductibles, and any patient can sign up with and be referred to any practice within California. In exchange for mandating 100% acceptance of this insurance, the state will cover medical & nursing school, school loans, or match retirement funds as long as doctors & nurses practice in the state for 10 years and accept assignments to underserved communities. Since Californians will now have a truly affordable insurance plan they can use anywhere in the state, an individual mandate will actually make sense and benefit everyone.

If you would like this proposal to be considered, please call the Assembly Budget Committee at (916) 319-2099. Thank you for your support.

Soft Single Payer Proposal

  • I. State-owned non-profit insurance corporation
  • A. No Waivers Needed — Insures residents in the gap between Medicaid & Medicare
  • B. Not subject to Props 13, 4, or 98 (Articles 13, 13b, & 16) — Very little funding needed
  • C. Does not touch ERISA plans
  • D. Union plans are not affected
  • E. Can be up & running quickly
  • II. Funding
  • A. Main source of funds is insurance premiums
  • 1. Premiums are adjusted based on insured’s income
  • a) Employers can contribute as with normal insurance plans
  • B. State provides or subsidizes reinsurance policies for unexpected high-cost and catastrophic claims
  • C. State guarantees or subsidizes low-interest loans for startup and capital needs
  • III. Implementation
  • A. State appoints board members who then run the nonprofit
  • B. Covers Medical, Dental, Vision, Mental Health, & Pharma
  • C. No copays, coinsurance, out-of-pocket, or deductibles
  • D. “The Grand Bargain”
  • 1. The State provides to Doctors & Nurses
  • a. Free medical/nursing school for qualified applicants
  • b. Loan forgiveness for those who’ve already completed school and residency
  • c. Matching contribution to retirement fund for those who don’t need a&b
  • 2. Must practice in California for 10 years and accept placement to underserved communities
  • 3. All California doctors, clinics, & hospitals mandated to accept this insurance
  • a. “In-network” = negotiated contracts
  • 1) Provider contracts with other insurance companies must be disclosed
  • b. “Out-of-network” = No contract or Refusal to negotiate = Medicare + 15%
  • 4. Individual mandate
  • IV. Side Benefits
  • A. Can accept contracts with Medicaid
  • B. Can be a Medicare Advantage supplemental plan
  • C. Can operate on the Covered California exchange
  • D. Any “profits” will be used to lower premiums, pay off debts, keep a reserve, and any other expenditures used as necessary to lower costs and ensure long-term solvency

EUHC4CA/Google Survey: 59% Of Californians Want To Be Taxed For Single Payer

For Immediate Release – SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA

When Enact Universal Healthcare For California asked Californians if they would pay the State of California instead of health insurance companies in exchange for receiving single payer healthcare, 59% said “Yes.” 

Our survey is a direct response to previous surveys that did not ask specifically about a California single payer system, or did not explain that, in a single payer system, taxes simply replace health insurance payments and fees and do not place an added financial burden on the individual or state. Please note that our survey left it open as to what form these taxes would take. Ultimately, we wanted to ask the worst question possible for proponents, and it turns out that our blunt honesty has been rewarded.

The age ranges of 18-24, 25-34, and 35-44 overwhelmingly chose “Yes,” while 45-54, 55-64, and 65+ broke on the side of “No.”

Men slightly favored the taxes more then women, 51.3% to 48.7%.

The survey was run by Google Surveys on Nov. 10 – 12, 2018 and had 734 respondents. Margin of error: “Yes” +3.7%/-3.8%, “No” +3.4%/-3.3%

EUHC4CA Candidate Scores for November 6, 2018, General Election

Note on scoring: Scores are based on single payer universal healthcare only. At times it’s a subjective call when we have to divine a candidate’s position from few actions and few words. Points are not given out lightly. Unless a candidate has introduced and gotten our legislation passed, don’t count on more than 3/5.

>>Scores are limited to Democrat on Democrat or Democrat on No-Party-Preference. Not all were scored.<<

SinglePayer #UniversalHealthcare #California #GeneralElection2018 #Vote

Visit Us
Follow Me